The True Believer by Eric Hoffer – Book Review

The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements

It is amazing that the author was a stevedore on the San Francisco Waterfront. The book covers the key elements and approaches to mass movements and fanatical followings. The insights into the leadership characteristics, personalities, and twentieth-century movements of Fascism, Communism, Nazism, Indian independence, FDR, and Churchill are covered. 

What is a mass movement, and what are its characteristics

A mass movement is a large-scale social phenomenon that brings together people from various backgrounds under a shared sense of purpose. This can be driven by charismatic leaders who tap into members’ underlying grievances and frustrations, giving them an outlet for their discontent and providing a sense of direction and identity.

Mass movements typically have several defining characteristics, including an organized hierarchy of leadership, an ideology or set of beliefs that frame the movement’s goals, and collective action to achieve these goals through both peaceful and violent means. While mass movements can sometimes lead to positive societal changes, they are also often associated with times of social unrest and polarization. They can be used as tools for gaining power or manipulating public opinion.

Eric Hoffer famously defined a mass movement as “a social framework which relieves emotional tensions by focusing impulses and frustrations on a restrictive target outside the self.” This captures many vital elements that define such movements, highlighting their ability to channel and direct emotion toward specific goals. While many mass movements exist in different historical contexts, they all share common characteristics and unique features that set them apart from other forms of collective action.

The psychology of the true believer

The psychology of the true believer is a fascinating subject, rooted in the unique qualities that make people susceptible to charismatic leaders and extreme ideologies.

Eric Hoffer, an influential American writer, and philosopher, were one of the first to study this phenomenon in great detail. He argued that people most likely to believe wholeheartedly in a particular cause are often driven by a deep sense of loneliness or misguided feelings of inadequacy. They may seek structure and guidance or be desperate for acceptance or belonging. However, Hoffer also noted that being a true believer can also hold deep appeal for specific individuals, offering a sense of empowerment or fulfillment that cannot be achieved through mundane pursuits.

Regardless of what drives them, true believers remain essential on the world stage, influencing politics and collective thought with their unwavering convictions. In short, the psychology of the true believer is a complex but endlessly fascinating social phenomenon that continues to shape our modern world.

How mass movements can be used for good or evil

Mass movements are potent tools that can be used for good or evil. On the one hand, they can inspire ordinary people to unite around a common cause and work for the greater good.

Leaders of mass movements can inspire others through their words and actions, mobilizing large numbers of people toward shared goals. On the other hand, these movements can also be hijacked by those with an agenda. They can spiral out of control without proper leadership or organization and take on a destructive dynamic that leads to violence and conflict.

Overall, while mass movements have an undeniably transformative power, we must ensure that they are used for the greater good rather than selfish purposes.

The dangers of blindly following a mass movement

It is easy to get swept up in the crowd’s momentum in politics and social movements. Whether through silence or acquiescence, we can be tempted to blindly follow along with whatever seems to be the conventional wisdom at the time. But Eric Hoffer, a noted political philosopher, warned about such blind following in his influential work The True Believer. According to Hoffer, opportunistic leaders often lead mass movements that prey upon people’s fears and dissatisfaction to further their ambitions.

Without careful reflection and moral leadership from within, these movements can quickly become riddled with hatred, paranoia, and violent actions. Thus, when considering our engagement in collective action, we must think critically and examine the motives of those in power over us. Only then can we avoid being blind followers ourselves and truly positively impact society.

The power of the individual to resist or support a mass movement

It is often said that a single individual’s actions can significantly impact the outcome of a movement or cause. Whether guiding others through leadership, standing up to injustice, or committing collective resistance, one person can make all the difference. This phenomenon is what Eric Hoffer refers to as ‘the power of the individual.

Hoffer’s ideas are based on centuries of examples and anecdotes. From great leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, who fought for Indian independence from Britain, to the courageous individuals who resisted repressive regimes during the Arab Spring revolutions across the Middle East, it is clear that individual action can lead to lasting change. And while these movements were made possible by more significant factors, such as an economic crisis or political unrest, it would not have been possible without brave individuals willing to take a stand.

As Hoffer famously observed, “every great movement has its figureheads.” While it is impossible to predict where and when an individual will emerge as a powerful voice for change, there is no doubt that this person exists within every mass movement – sometimes in unexpected places and sometimes more evident than we expect. As such, we must always be aware of our potential to resist or support through our actions. This way, we can help ensure that even small efforts add to something significant over time. After all, history has shown us over and over again that anything is possible when people take a stand together.